Mind-Warp PaVilion
  Home   Forum   Torrents Artwork Frappr Login Register  
March 11, 2010, 01:08:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go MWP [gomwp.org] Announced. You can read about it by clicking here.
 
   Forum   Calendar Help  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: ipod Nanno video question / advice  (Read 2158 times)
0 Members and 1 Other are viewing this topic.
screen54
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,257



« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2008, 05:35:48 PM »

I think that in the real world, 120GB is plenty. I have spent the last three days loading up around 150 CDs which I have not played in a while for a total of around 35GB. I was surprised to hear a significant audio improvement over the Shuffle I have been using...until I realised that I had ripped the whole lot to wav with no compression. A small change in this department now will probably mean that I don't have sufficient silvers to fill the device Cheesy (No point in multiple copies of Bowie now is there?)

I got the 160 for 190GBP which, considering that on Christmas Eve a 120 would have cost 175GBP,  was quite a bargain.

Only one thing that really pisses me off is that I am now a nasty pirate. Even though I have bought and paid for every CD on my iPod, each and every one is in breach of the UKs archaic copyright laws. This being the case, why do I buy any CDs when I could just download them from TPB and be in breach of the same laws without any financial outlay?
Logged

Put your money in the mojo bucket!
117
The Pedant
VIP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,550


look. laugh. but don't touch.


Hide Posts
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2008, 06:38:29 PM »

I think that in the real world, 120GB is plenty. I have spent the last three days loading up around 150 CDs which I have not played in a while for a total of around 35GB.

Indeed, I have my entire music collection on my 160GB, I bought it with a view to expansion in the future, my collection currently stands at 46.17GB for 12.1 days of continous music  Smiley
Logged

freestate
1450.010208
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,515


I know the pieces fit...


WWW
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2008, 10:06:17 PM »

A little further piece of advice - when you're encoding to .m4a in iTunes set it at 256kb/s father than the default 128. Sure, the files will be bigger but the improvement in sound quality is significant especially if you're using decent headphones. Personally, I use Koss Porta-Pros arounf the house and Koss Sporta-Pros when I'm outside. The Sporta-Pros are a bit more robust in their construction.  Wink
Logged

three minutes of happiness borrowed from a dog
117
The Pedant
VIP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,550


look. laugh. but don't touch.


Hide Posts
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2008, 10:10:30 AM »

A little further piece of advice - when you're encoding to .m4a in iTunes set it at 256kb/s father than the default 128. Sure, the files will be bigger but the improvement in sound quality is significant especially if you're using decent headphones. Personally, I use Koss Porta-Pros arounf the house and Koss Sporta-Pros when I'm outside. The Sporta-Pros are a bit more robust in their construction.  Wink

sound advice indeed  Smiley

I've never heard of Koss  Embarrassed    I use Sennheiser HDR120 wireless headphones at home, and some Sennheiser in-ear ones whose model I can't remember when I'm out  Smiley
Logged

trevorhalvo
VIP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,107


Bowie Base One


Hide Posts
« Reply #19 on: January 09, 2009, 12:07:19 PM »

I think that in the real world, 120GB is plenty. I have spent the last three days loading up around 150 CDs which I have not played in a while for a total of around 35GB. I was surprised to hear a significant audio improvement over the Shuffle I have been using...until I realised that I had ripped the whole lot to wav with no compression. A small change in this department now will probably mean that I don't have sufficient silvers to fill the device Cheesy (No point in multiple copies of Bowie now is there?)

But surely the 160 GB is better than the 120GB if you want your music in WAV or Apple lossless and a few videos / DVD's on your ipod as well, ie at the same time. I was reading a review the other day on the new 120GB, and Which magazine reckons the new 120Gb has a lot better sound capability than the old 80 & 160Gb models, but to take advantage of it it says you must encode at higher than the default 128kbs and of course use decent ear / head phones and not the supplied Apple ones.

They concluded that for music buffs the 120Gb clasic is the one to have because of the sound quality and HD space and the ipod touch is the one to have if you are into everything ie music ( compressed  at 128kbs I assume to to small capacity GB's ) vids, internet and games etc.

You pays yer money and take yer choice I suppose, but I would still prefer the 160Gb Classic simply because it has more GB's and thus more options  available regarding a music and video mix.

It seems a strange decision to sell a less GB version even if it does have ( slightly ) superior sound over the older 160GB version.
Logged

117
The Pedant
VIP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,550


look. laugh. but don't touch.


Hide Posts
« Reply #20 on: January 09, 2009, 04:09:03 PM »



It seems a strange decision to sell a less GB version even if it does have ( slightly ) superior sound over the older 160GB version.

I'm guessing it's about cutting production costs - I should imagine they're saving a fair bit by only making the one version of that model, and they're not losing much in the way of custom by doing it because if people want a high capacity iPod then they'll buy that regardless of whether there are better/cheaper products on the market - it's all in a name
Logged

Piras
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,354


Uut Grunn


« Reply #21 on: August 12, 2009, 10:05:06 AM »


Finally bought myself some Sennheiser in-ear headphones.....Wow!  Grin
Logged

zzz
Junior VIP Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 351


Hide Posts
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2009, 05:36:59 PM »

I've resisted nano's for now, but I'm on my third set of Sennheisers (whatever is the current name for HD 40's) in about thirty years.  One set wore out, and I destroyed the other pair while walking off, when standing on the cable!  These things are strong, I nearly ripped my head off my shoulders.  Heartily recommend them.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Google
Page created in 0.313 seconds with 28 queries.
Google visited last this page January 12, 2010, 10:46:48 PM
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC

Home | Torrent Tracker | Forum | Artwork Gallery